Friday, March 6, 2015

Pakistan Censors VOA

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan slammed the government Thursday for stopping three human rights activists from leaving the country to attend a conference in New York.
In a written press release, HRCP called it “ridiculous” that the government would bar travel in order to censor someone’s point of view.
One of the activists, 73-year-old Abdul Qadeer Baloch — known as Mama [Uncle] Qadeer — made headlines last year when he walked a grueling 2,000 kilometers from Quetta to the capital, Islamabad, with a group of other activists to raise awareness about enforced disappearances in the restive Balochistan province.
He planned to travel to New York with Farzana Majeed, fellow member of the Voice for Baloch Missing Persons, and activist Faiqa, who goes by only one name. They had been invited by the Sindh Academic and Cultural Society of North America to attend a March 7 conference on alleged human rights violations in Balochistan and Sindh provinces.
Majeed said she was told by officials of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) of Pakistan that her and Qadeers' names had been added to the exit control list, used to block people from travelling abroad, an hour before their arrival at the airport. Faiqa said she was stopped for traveling with them. Majeed was also told that a report had been filed with the police accusing her and Qadeer of “anti-state activities.”
Ministry of Interior officials, reached by VOA, said they were not authorized to speak on this issue and could not find someone who was.
An English language daily, the Dawn newspaper, reported that FIA Director Shahid Hayat confirmed Qadeer’s name was added to the exit control list.
History of grievances
Balochistan, a western Pakistani province bordering Iran, has a history of grievances against Pakistan’s central government that has led to several armed insurgencies. Baloch rights activists complain their province has been denied development and growth while natural resources extracted from the province have been used to develop other regions, particularly Pakistan’s most populous province, Punjab.
The activists maintain that those who raise their voices about these topics face the wrath of the country’s security agencies.
In a public statement last year, Amnesty International wrote: “The Frontier Corps and other state security forces have been widely implicated in enforced disappearances, extra-judicial executions and other human rights violations in the province for several years.”
The Frontier Corps is a paramilitary force used to maintain law and order in Balochistan due to the lack of an adequately developed provincial police.
An international conference on disappearances in Asia, held in Islamabad last month, adopted a resolution that expressed “alarm” that enforced and involuntary disappearances are continuing unabated in many Asian countries. Delegates of India, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and the Philippines attended the conference. 
The United Nations office of human rights has urged the Pakistani government several times to investigate reports of enforced disappearances and other human rights violations, particularly in Balochistan. In 2011, then-U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay expressed alarm at the “extrajudicial killings, abductions, and disappearances of minority leaders and political activists in Baluchistan.”
The U.N. Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances visited Pakistan at the invitation of the government in 2012. In its report, it expressed concern at the “pattern” of involuntary or enforced disappearances and at allegations that “law enforcement agencies in conjunction with intelligence agencies” were involved.
Pakistan’s Supreme Court ordered the government to recover victims of enforced disappearances in 2013, but activists complain of lack of action on the order.
Security failures
Meanwhile, security agencies deny charges of human rights violations and insist they are working in a difficult security situation to keep law and order in a province that has seen widespread militant activity, including ethnic and religious violence.
Many young men considered “missing,” they say, often get involved with religious extremists and leave without informing their families. Others get involved with armed groups and become victims of turf warfare. Still others are picked up because they are involved in “terrorist activities” or collude with Pakistan’s rival India for their separatist agenda. These agencies point to varied violent attacks to show how many different kinds of groups are operating in the region that are involved in human rights violations.
An attack by Taliban militants on two air force bases in the provincial capital Quetta last year left more than 10 militants dead and a dozen or so security personnel injured.
The Shi’ite Hazara community has often been a target of attacks claimed by Sunni militant groups. A separatist group, Baloch Liberation Army, claimed responsibility for a 2013 attack that burned down the two-story house in which Pakistan’s founder Mohammad Ali Jinnah spent his last days.
In 2010, a constitutional amendment was passed, granting more autonomy to provinces. It was followed by the election of a middle class leader from a progressive political party as the head of Balochistan government in 2013. These raised hopes for change. However, the Balochistan government has come under increased criticism by Baloch nationalist leaders for “failure” to improve the security situation in the province.
Meanwhile, Balochistan activists such as Mama Qadeer, whose son was picked up in 2009, and whose dead body was found in 2011 with signs of torture, and Farzana Majeed, whose brother remains missing after a 2009 disappearance, are waiting to find out why they have been denied the right to travel and what charges have been filed against them.

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

The Continuing Scourge of Censorship

It is no surprise that most Pakistani journalists work under tremendous stress; caught between crime lords in its biggest cities, militant groups across its tribal belt and rival political parties throughout the country, censorship, intimidation and death seem almost to come with the territory.
But while many have become accustomed to working with a degree of fear and uncertainty, none could have been prepared for the number of tragedies that unfolded in 2014, the worst year ever for the media in Pakistan.
All told, last year saw the deaths of 14 journalists, media assistants and bloggers, while dozens more were injured, kidnapped or intimidated.
Reports by rights groups here point to a culture of impunity that is rendering impossible the notion of a free press, which activists and experts say is crucial to development and peace in a country mired in poverty and conflict.
Deaths, attacks, violence
“Pakistan’s media community is effectively under siege. Journalists, in particular those covering national security issues or human rights, are targeted from all sides in a disturbing pattern of abuses carried out to silence their reporting." -- David Griffiths, Amnesty International’s deputy Asia-Pacific director
A report released last month by the Pakistan-based Freedom Network (FN) documents numerous assassinations and attacks including the Jan. 1 shooting of Shan Dahar, a reporter with Abb Takk Television in Larkana, a city in the southern Sindh Province.
The local media initially reported that stray bullets fired during New Year’s Day celebrations hit Dahar, but subsequent investigations suggest that the killing was planned.
At the time of his death, the reporter had been working on a story about Pakistan’s sprawling black market for unregulated drugs; some believe that those with vested interests in the industry had a hand in his death.
Other documented deaths include the Jan. 17 killing of Waqas Aziz Khan, Ashraf Arain and Muhammad Khalid in a suburb of Karachi when gunmen opened fire on a media van used for live transmissions by Express TV.
While none of those killed were journalists – one was a security guard, one a driver and the other a technician for Express TV – activists here say their deaths represent the deadly climate for anyone involved, however remotely, with the press.
The FN report tracks patterns and challenges ahead for the industry in Pakistan, including trends such as the invocation of laws on blasphemy and treason to intimidate media houses, and the use of crippling fines and blanket bans on coverage that have forced many outlets to practice self-censorship in an effort to stay afloat.
In what the Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) called a “chilling” example of these laws, last November one of the country’s Anti-Terrorism Courts sentenced four citizens to 26 years each in prison, plus a 12,800-dollar fine apiece, for airing a “contentious” television programme, supposedly in violation of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws.
Climate of impunity
Other incidents that have media workers here on edge include the April 2014 assault on Hamid Mir, a senior reporter for Geo TV, who was fired at by gunmen on motorcycles while on his way from the airport to his office in Karachi.
Though he survived the attack, and his since undergone a successful operation, his assailants are still at large, and the threat to his life is still very much alive.
Mazhar Abbas, a former president of the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists, tells IPS that the government’s inability to ensure freedom of expression has put reporters in an extremely difficult situation.
“The problem is that nobody knows who is killing the journalists,” he says. A complete dearth of official information on the perpetrators, combined with a lack of proper investigations, means that far too many journalists continue to operate within a climate of uncertainty and impunity, experts say.
In the northern Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), journalists suffer constant threats and attacks from the Taliban and other militant groups that have operated on the border of Afghanistan since fleeing the U.S. invasion of their country in 2001.
Since the War on Terror began, 12 journalists in FATA have lost their lives, while scores of others have fled to Peshawar, capital of the neighbouring Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
For others, being out of reach of terrorist groups does not necessarily guarantee security. According to Amnesty International, hundreds of journalists in Pakistan experience threats, harassment and violence, sometimes even at the hands of the intelligence services.
The rights group’s recent report, ‘A Bullet has Been Chosen for You’, presents 34 cases in which journalists have been killed in retaliation for their work since 2008; only one of the perpetrators has been booked for the crime. The report blasts the authorities for failing to stem the bloody wave of violence against media workers, which activists say constitutes a grave violation of human rights.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) estimates that 56 journalists have been killed in Pakistan since 1992. This figure, however, includes only those cases in which there was a clear motive for the death; activists here believe the true number of murders could be much higher.
Even those who aren’t killed exist in a kind of grey space, where they constantly fear reprisals for investigations or exposures that implicate any number of political actors.
“Pakistan’s media community is effectively under siege,” said David Griffiths, Amnesty International’s deputy Asia-Pacific director, when the report was released last year. “Journalists, in particular those covering national security issues or human rights, are targeted from all sides in a disturbing pattern of abuses carried out to silence their reporting.
“The constant threat puts journalists in an impossible position, where virtually any sensitive story leaves them at risk of violence from one side or another,” he added.
In a country that is ranked 126th on Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), just a few places ahead of nations like Myanmar, Afghanistan and North Korea, experts say that a free press is essential to educating the public and exposing fraud, theft and rights violations on a massive scale.

Saturday, January 31, 2015

Worldwide Censorship

70 percent of People live with the Censor

An average of 70 percent of people living in six Arab countries said in a recently released study that they're in favor of censoring entertainment programs.
Northwestern University in Qatar, in partnership with the Doha Film Institute, interviewed more than 6,000 citizens and expatriates in Egypt, Lebanon, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia and the United Arab Emirates about their media consumption and attitudes toward entertainment. An average of seven in 10 respondents said they believe that violent and romantic content should be more heavily regulated and that "some scenes should be deleted, or whole programs banned, if some people find them offensive."

The Stench of Censorship

70 percent of People live with the Censor

An average of 70 percent of people living in six Arab countries said in a recently released study that they're in favor of censoring entertainment programs.
Northwestern University in Qatar, in partnership with the Doha Film Institute, interviewed more than 6,000 citizens and expatriates in Egypt, Lebanon, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia and the United Arab Emirates about their media consumption and attitudes toward entertainment. An average of seven in 10 respondents said they believe that violent and romantic content should be more heavily regulated and that "some scenes should be deleted, or whole programs banned, if some people find them offensive."

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Fox Complaints

Dish Network customers are heading toward the one-week mark minus access to Fox News Channel or Fox Business Channel, after those networks’ parent company could not reach agreement with the satellite TV provider on a new distribution deal. Finger pointing between 21st Century Fox and Dish broke out in the middle of the night on December 20, as carriage talks between the two failed to produce a deal by midnight, resulting in Fox News and Fox Business no longer being available on Dish.

Dish has updated its Facebook page with a video message from chairman Charlie Ergen, in which he says that, during the talks about the two news channels, Fox demanded a “surcharge” that tripled rates on an “unrelated, less popular” Fox channel on which Dish already had a carriage agreement that was not set to expire “for some time.”

“The result of this tactic is Fox News became hostage to an unrelated channel, where the price increase was not justified by our existing contract, or its viewership,” Ergen says in the video. “Ironically, Fox News would be first to decry this type of deal making,” he continues. “Imagine if your federal taxes were suddenly increased dramatically, or you were taxed in a state you did not live in. There was nothing about this extortion attempt that was fair – or balanced. Rather, it was greedy, arrogant, and disrespectful to you, their loyal viewer,” he said, noting Dish customers would ultimately be footing the bill for those “outrageous demands.”

Today, Fox put this message up on its Facebook page:

“DISH customers: Since DISH dropped Fox News, DISH has focused on shifting blame instead of getting Fox News back on the air. But the facts speak for themselves – DISH has blocked more than 10 channels in the last six months alone. We continue to work on resolving this situation, but until DISH is responsive, we are unable to update you on when Fox News will be available. Go to http://www.KeepFoxNews.com to get the latest and to find alternate providers in your area where you can get Fox News.

Meanwhile, customers would seem to be getting restless, looking across Dish’s Facebook page:

“All done. Just listened to your rant. Switching to another carrier! I pay for a channel I want to watch it!!” complained one post.

“Dish thank you for doing America a favor and taking Fox News out of your channel lineup,” countered another.

Back at midnight on December 20, Fox News Channel EVP Distribution Tim Carry said, “It is disappointing that, after nearly two decades without a blackout, Fox News Channel has been blocked by Dish Network,” adding,”This is the third time in as many months that Dish customers have suffered through a blackout due to Dish intransigence.” (He was referencing two earlier Dish disputes, one of which led to a blackout for Dish customers of CBS, and another in which Dish customers lost access to Turner Broadcasting channels, including CNN, Cartoon Network, TBS, TNT, and Turner Classic Movies.)

Countered Dish: “Tonight, 21st Century Fox, Inc. blocked Dish customer access to Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network, as the media conglomerate introduced other channels into negotiations despite those channels not being included in the contract up for renewal.” Added Dish SVP Programming Warren Schlichting, “It’s like we’re about to close on a house and the realtor is trying to make us buy a new car as well. Fox blacked out two of its news channels, using them as leverage to triple rates on sports and entertainment channels that are not in this contract.”

The next morning Carry fired back that Fox did not try to force Dish to buy a car along with a house: “I love the whole ‘real estate and car’ thing – I thought that was pretty brilliant, but pretty inaccurate. That’s not what we’re asking. What [Dish is] looking at is a mansion, and you want to buy it like it’s a double lot.”

Since then, Fox’s focus has been on getting FNC fans switched from Dish to another service ASAP, using Facebook to reach Dish’s 14 million subscribers with a new account it set up, called KeepFoxNews.com.

The 888 phone line Fox set up when it launched its campaign alerting Dish customers they might lose access to Fox News Channel reports it has received nearly 179,000 calls since launch and nearly 55,000 since the two channels were dropped. Of the Dish customers who’ve contacted the phone number, nearly 118,000 have been transferred to Dish to drop the provider, more than 31,000 of them since the channels were dropped.

“Closing on a house and the realtor is trying to make you buy a car” isn’t that what you force us to do!!!!” one angry Dish customer says on that company’s Facebook page. “All I want to watch is FOX, and you make me buy a zillion other crap channels that I don’t want!!!!!! Hard to swallow you’re own medicine isn’t it Charlie!!!! I’m done!!!”
- See more at: http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_36704.php#sthash.Zf8foyob.dpuf

Censor ship At Dish

Dish Network customers are heading toward the one-week mark minus access to Fox News Channel or Fox Business Channel, after those networks’ parent company could not reach agreement with the satellite TV provider on a new distribution deal. Finger pointing between 21st Century Fox and Dish broke out in the middle of the night on December 20, as carriage talks between the two failed to produce a deal by midnight, resulting in Fox News and Fox Business no longer being available on Dish.

Dish has updated its Facebook page with a video message from chairman Charlie Ergen, in which he says that, during the talks about the two news channels, Fox demanded a “surcharge” that tripled rates on an “unrelated, less popular” Fox channel on which Dish already had a carriage agreement that was not set to expire “for some time.”

“The result of this tactic is Fox News became hostage to an unrelated channel, where the price increase was not justified by our existing contract, or its viewership,” Ergen says in the video. “Ironically, Fox News would be first to decry this type of deal making,” he continues. “Imagine if your federal taxes were suddenly increased dramatically, or you were taxed in a state you did not live in. There was nothing about this extortion attempt that was fair – or balanced. Rather, it was greedy, arrogant, and disrespectful to you, their loyal viewer,” he said, noting Dish customers would ultimately be footing the bill for those “outrageous demands.”

Today, Fox put this message up on its Facebook page:

“DISH customers: Since DISH dropped Fox News, DISH has focused on shifting blame instead of getting Fox News back on the air. But the facts speak for themselves – DISH has blocked more than 10 channels in the last six months alone. We continue to work on resolving this situation, but until DISH is responsive, we are unable to update you on when Fox News will be available. Go to http://www.KeepFoxNews.com to get the latest and to find alternate providers in your area where you can get Fox News.

Meanwhile, customers would seem to be getting restless, looking across Dish’s Facebook page:

“All done. Just listened to your rant. Switching to another carrier! I pay for a channel I want to watch it!!” complained one post.

“Dish thank you for doing America a favor and taking Fox News out of your channel lineup,” countered another.

Back at midnight on December 20, Fox News Channel EVP Distribution Tim Carry said, “It is disappointing that, after nearly two decades without a blackout, Fox News Channel has been blocked by Dish Network,” adding,”This is the third time in as many months that Dish customers have suffered through a blackout due to Dish intransigence.” (He was referencing two earlier Dish disputes, one of which led to a blackout for Dish customers of CBS, and another in which Dish customers lost access to Turner Broadcasting channels, including CNN, Cartoon Network, TBS, TNT, and Turner Classic Movies.)

Countered Dish: “Tonight, 21st Century Fox, Inc. blocked Dish customer access to Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network, as the media conglomerate introduced other channels into negotiations despite those channels not being included in the contract up for renewal.” Added Dish SVP Programming Warren Schlichting, “It’s like we’re about to close on a house and the realtor is trying to make us buy a new car as well. Fox blacked out two of its news channels, using them as leverage to triple rates on sports and entertainment channels that are not in this contract.”

The next morning Carry fired back that Fox did not try to force Dish to buy a car along with a house: “I love the whole ‘real estate and car’ thing – I thought that was pretty brilliant, but pretty inaccurate. That’s not what we’re asking. What [Dish is] looking at is a mansion, and you want to buy it like it’s a double lot.”

Since then, Fox’s focus has been on getting FNC fans switched from Dish to another service ASAP, using Facebook to reach Dish’s 14 million subscribers with a new account it set up, called KeepFoxNews.com.

The 888 phone line Fox set up when it launched its campaign alerting Dish customers they might lose access to Fox News Channel reports it has received nearly 179,000 calls since launch and nearly 55,000 since the two channels were dropped. Of the Dish customers who’ve contacted the phone number, nearly 118,000 have been transferred to Dish to drop the provider, more than 31,000 of them since the channels were dropped.

“Closing on a house and the realtor is trying to make you buy a car” isn’t that what you force us to do!!!!” one angry Dish customer says on that company’s Facebook page. “All I want to watch is FOX, and you make me buy a zillion other crap channels that I don’t want!!!!!! Hard to swallow you’re own medicine isn’t it Charlie!!!! I’m done!!!”
- See more at: http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_36704.php#sthash.Zf8foyob.dpuf

National Press Club

A handful of state legislators from across the country gathered at the National Press Club in Washington, DC to announcethe creation of “American State Legislators for Gun Violence Prevention” or ASLGVP. The new group, which claims to be non-partisan, will work to push new gun restrictions at the state level. But the coalition has one major problem – they will not let anyone know who they are.

ASLGVP boasts having 200 members from all 50 states but the group will not release a list of their membership, due to a fear of “political backlash.” So, outside of the eight members that participated in the inaugural press conference, no one knows who is or is not a member of this group. We are not witnessing a “Profiles in Courage“moment here.

Citizens across the country have a right to know whether or not their respective elected official is a member of this group. Considering that ASLGVP intends to potentially tamper with our Constitutional rights, it is unethical and secretive for members to keep their constituents in the dark about their participation in the group. If a state legislator is too scared to reveal his or her affiliation with this group, shouldn’t that say something about the agenda that ASLGVP may be trying to move forward?

Perhaps members of this group have opted to keep their participation in ASLGVP a secret because they do not want people to know how out of touch they really are — with their constituents but also the country as a whole. Last week, the Pew Research Center released the results from its newest pollwhich found that public support for gun rights has never been higher. The survey showed that 52 percent of Americans believe it is important to protect our Second Amendment rights, a figure that increased seven points over the past year. Since public opinion is not in their favor, ASLGVP members, once they reveal their identities, should indeed be fearful of “political backlash” – a vote out of office in the next election.

ASLGVP said it would meet this week in Washington, DC for the first time. NSSF would like to attend and hear more about the group’s agenda, but the meeting time and location is secret. Of course it is. We assume disguises are optional? How about secret handshakes or de-coder rings?

How about this? Any elected public official who believes they must conduct themselves in such cartoonish secrecy is certainly raising questions about their fitness for their office. As for transparency, well they clearly don’t see any need for that quaint notion of representative government. They’ll tell us what they want to tell us when they’re ready. In the meantime, mum’s the word.
- See more at: http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_36687.php#sthash.Tyqg9pte.dpuf